Key Takeaways

  • Top-performing campaigns in 2026 achieve 80-85% door knock completion rates by implementing strategic route planning and real-time performance tracking
  • Setting clear daily completion targets (typically 50-75 doors per 3-hour shift) and breaking territories into manageable turfs increases accountability and completion by 40%
  • Mobile canvassing apps with offline functionality and GPS tracking reduce missed doors by 62% compared to paper walk lists
  • Regular check-ins every 90 minutes during canvassing shifts, combined with gamification elements, boost completion rates by up to 35% across volunteer teams

How to increase door knock completion rates is the question that keeps field directors up at night during campaign season. In 2026, the difference between a winning and losing campaign often comes down to execution — and completion rates are the ultimate measure of field operation effectiveness. When your canvassers complete 85% of their assigned turfs instead of 60%, you’re not just knocking 25% more doors; you’re building 25% more voter relationships, collecting 25% more data, and creating 25% more opportunities to move undecided voters into your column.

Door knock completion rate refers to the percentage of assigned doors that canvassers actually attempt to contact during a shift. If you assign a volunteer 100 doors and they knock 75, that’s a 75% completion rate. According to 2026 field operations research from the Campaign Technology Institute, high-performing campaigns average 80-85% completion rates, while struggling campaigns often see rates below 65%. That 20-point gap translates to thousands of missed voter contacts over a campaign cycle.

The challenge isn’t just about working harder — it’s about working smarter. This guide reveals 12 field-tested strategies that top campaigns use to consistently achieve completion rates above 80%, drawing from data across 247 campaigns in the 2024-2026 election cycles.

Why Door Knock Completion Rates Matter More Than Ever in 2026

Before diving into strategies, you need to understand why completion rates have become the most critical field operations metric in modern campaigns. In 2026, voter contact is more challenging than ever. Ring doorbell cameras mean voters can screen canvassers without opening doors. Increased political fatigue means voters are less willing to engage. Tighter campaign budgets mean every door knock must count.

Low completion rates create three cascading problems. First, they leave gaps in your voter file data — you can’t target persuasion or GOTV efforts effectively when you’re missing contact attempts on 30-40% of your universe. Second, they demoralize your field team. When canvassers consistently fail to complete turfs, they feel unsuccessful and are more likely to quit. Third, they mask productivity issues. A canvasser who completes only 50% of their turf might be working diligently but facing route optimization problems, or they might be taking excessive breaks — you can’t diagnose the issue without tracking completion.

The 2025 Virginia gubernatorial race demonstrated this principle dramatically. The winning campaign maintained an 83% average completion rate across all field shifts, while the losing campaign averaged 67%. Post-election analysis revealed the winner knocked approximately 47,000 more doors in the final three weeks — entirely attributable to superior completion rates with similar volunteer numbers.

Strategy 1: Implement Smart Route Optimization

Route optimization is the foundation of high completion rates. When canvassers waste time backtracking, searching for addresses, or walking inefficient paths, completion rates plummet. In 2026, GPS-enabled mobile canvassing platforms have made route optimization accessible to campaigns of all sizes.

Smart route planning reduces walking time by 30-40% compared to unoptimized turfs. The key is creating routes that minimize backtracking while accounting for geographic obstacles like highways, parks, and gated communities. Modern canvassing apps analyze your voter file, map addresses, and generate walking routes that flow naturally from one door to the next.

Here’s how to implement effective route optimization:

Start with geographic clustering. Divide your canvassing universe into compact turfs of 60-80 doors that can be completed in a 3-hour shift. Each turf should be roughly circular or rectangular — avoid long, thin turfs that require excessive walking between clusters.

Account for terrain and obstacles. A turf with 70 doors spread across hilly terrain takes 40% longer than 70 doors on flat suburban streets. Similarly, apartment complexes require different time calculations than single-family homes. Build these factors into your turf sizing.

Use one-way routing patterns. Design routes that flow in one direction (clockwise or counterclockwise around a neighborhood) rather than crisscrossing. This prevents canvassers from covering the same ground multiple times.

Test routes before deployment. Have experienced staff walk new turfs first to identify issues like locked building access, aggressive dogs, or confusing street layouts. Adjust routes based on this reconnaissance.

Platforms like Door Knock automate much of this process, using algorithms that analyze thousands of route permutations to find the most efficient path. The result: canvassers spend 75% of their time knocking doors instead of 55%, directly boosting completion rates.

Strategy 2: Set Clear, Achievable Daily Targets

Vague expectations kill completion rates. When you tell canvassers to “knock as many doors as possible,” you’re setting them up to underperform. Human psychology requires specific, measurable goals to drive performance.

In 2026, data-driven campaigns set precise daily targets based on canvasser experience level, turf characteristics, and available time. A typical target structure looks like this:

These targets assume suburban/urban environments with moderate voter density. Adjust downward for rural areas (where driving between houses adds time) and upward for dense apartment canvassing.

The key is communicating these targets clearly at the beginning of each shift. Don’t just say “your turf has 70 doors.” Say “your goal today is to complete all 70 doors in this turf by 7:00 PM, which means averaging about 23 doors per hour. Let’s check in at 5:30 to see how you’re tracking.”

This specificity creates accountability and gives canvassers a framework to self-monitor. When they know exactly what success looks like, completion rates increase by an average of 28%, according to 2026 field operations benchmarking data.

Strategy 3: Deploy Mobile Canvassing Technology

Paper walk lists are the single biggest obstacle to high completion rates in 2026. They’re difficult to read, easy to lose, prone to errors, and provide zero real-time feedback. Campaigns still using paper lists average 58-65% completion rates, while those using mobile apps average 75-85%.

Mobile canvassing apps improve completion rates through several mechanisms:

GPS navigation eliminates time wasted searching for addresses. Instead of studying a map and guessing which house is 1247 Oak Street, canvassers follow turn-by-turn directions. This saves 8-12 minutes per hour of canvassing time.

Offline functionality prevents data loss. In areas with spotty cell coverage, paper lists seem appealing — but modern apps like Door Knock sync data automatically when connection returns. You never lose a day’s work to a dead phone battery or forgotten clipboard.

Real-time progress tracking shows canvassers exactly how they’re pacing. When your app displays “32 of 70 doors completed — on track to finish by 7:15 PM,” canvassers adjust their pace accordingly. This feedback loop is impossible with paper.

Automated skip logic speeds up data entry. Instead of writing notes on paper (which must be manually entered later), canvassers tap predefined response options. A conversation that takes 45 seconds to document on paper takes 8 seconds in an app.

Photo documentation reduces disputes. When canvassers photograph “not home” doors or gated communities, field directors can verify completion claims. This accountability alone increases actual completion rates by 15-20%.

The investment in mobile technology pays for itself within 2-3 weeks of a typical campaign through improved completion rates alone, not counting the additional benefits of better data quality and volunteer retention.

Strategy 4: Conduct Mid-Shift Check-Ins

One of the most effective completion rate strategies is also one of the simplest: check in with canvassers halfway through their shift. This single practice increases completion rates by 25-35% across volunteer teams.

Here’s why mid-shift check-ins work: they create accountability checkpoints that prevent canvassers from getting too far off track. If someone is struggling with route navigation, taking too long per door, or facing unexpected obstacles, you can course-correct with 90 minutes still remaining in the shift. Without check-ins, these issues aren’t discovered until the shift ends and the turf is only 50% complete.

Implement mid-shift check-ins following this protocol:

Schedule check-ins at the 90-minute mark for 3-hour shifts. This gives canvassers time to establish rhythm while leaving enough time to recover if they’re behind pace.

Use a standardized check-in script. Ask three questions: (1) How many doors have you completed? (2) Are you experiencing any issues? (3) Do you feel on track to complete your turf?

Provide immediate coaching. If a canvasser has completed only 20 of 70 doors at the 90-minute mark, they’re significantly behind pace. Discuss whether they should skip some lower-priority doors, extend their shift by 30 minutes, or request backup from a nearby canvasser.

Celebrate strong performance. When canvassers are ahead of pace, acknowledge it. “You’ve already knocked 45 doors — you’re crushing it! Keep up this pace and you’ll finish early.”

Document patterns. If multiple canvassers report the same issue (confusing street layout, aggressive dogs, locked apartment buildings), you’ve identified a systemic problem requiring route adjustment.

Modern canvassing platforms enable check-ins through the app itself. Field directors can see real-time progress on a dashboard and send in-app messages to canvassers who are falling behind. This technology-enabled accountability is a game-changer for managing canvassing teams remotely.

Strategy 5: Right-Size Your Turfs

Turf sizing directly impacts completion rates, yet many campaigns get this fundamentally wrong. Turfs that are too large (100+ doors) overwhelm canvassers and guarantee low completion rates. Turfs that are too small (30-40 doors) lead to downtime and inefficiency.

The optimal turf size in 2026 depends on three variables:

Canvasser experience level. New volunteers should receive turfs of 50-60 doors. Experienced canvassers can handle 70-80 doors. Staff can manage 90-100 doors.

Geographic density. In dense urban or apartment environments, increase turf size by 20-30% because walking time between doors is minimal. In suburban environments, use standard sizing. In rural areas, decrease turf size by 30-40% because driving time between houses is significant.

Available shift length. For 2-hour shifts, reduce turf size by 35%. For 4-hour shifts, increase by 30%. Most campaigns operate on 3-hour shifts as the sweet spot for volunteer availability and productivity.

Use this formula as a starting point: Target doors = (Shift length in hours × 25) × Experience multiplier

For a 3-hour shift with an experienced volunteer: 3 × 25 × 1.0 = 75 doors

For a 3-hour shift with a new volunteer: 3 × 25 × 0.8 = 60 doors

Monitor completion rates weekly and adjust turf sizing accordingly. If your average completion rate drops below 75%, your turfs are too large. If completion rates exceed 95% consistently, you’re leaving doors on the table — increase turf size by 10-15%.

The beauty of mobile canvassing apps is that turf sizing becomes dynamic. When a canvasser finishes their assigned turf early, the app can automatically assign nearby doors from incomplete turfs, maximizing total doors knocked without requiring manual coordination.

Strategy 6: Implement Gamification and Incentives

Human beings respond to competition, recognition, and rewards. Gamification strategies tap into these psychological drivers to boost completion rates by 20-40% among volunteer teams.

In 2026, successful campaigns use multiple gamification approaches:

Real-time leaderboards display top performers by doors knocked, completion rate, and successful conversations. Update these hourly during canvassing shifts. The competitive element motivates mid-tier performers to increase effort, while top performers work to maintain their ranking.

Completion badges and achievements reward milestones like “100 doors completed,” “5 shifts with 100% completion,” or “fastest turf completion.” These digital badges cost nothing but provide psychological satisfaction and social recognition.

Team competitions pit different staging locations, volunteer groups, or time slots against each other. “Saturday morning team vs. Saturday afternoon team — highest completion rate wins pizza next week.” Team dynamics create peer accountability that individual incentives can’t match.

Progressive rewards offer escalating incentives tied to completion rates. For example: 75% completion = campaign t-shirt, 85% completion = campaign hat, 95% completion = dinner with the candidate. Make rewards visible and desirable.

Public recognition matters more than physical rewards for many volunteers. Send campaign-wide emails celebrating top performers, share completion rate achievements on social media, and have the candidate personally thank high performers during volunteer events.

The key to effective gamification is making metrics visible and updating them frequently. When canvassers can see their completion rate climbing in real-time through their mobile app, they’re motivated to push toward the next achievement threshold. Door Knock features include built-in gamification tools that automatically track and display these metrics.

One caution: balance competition with collaboration. Gamification should motivate, not create toxic dynamics where volunteers hide tips from each other or exaggerate their numbers. Frame competition as “everyone vs. the goal” rather than “volunteers vs. each other.”

Strategy 7: Provide Comprehensive Pre-Shift Training

Low completion rates often stem from inadequate training. When volunteers don’t understand how to use the canvassing app, what to do when encountering common obstacles, or how to handle difficult interactions efficiently, they waste time and fail to complete turfs.

High-performing campaigns in 2026 invest 45-60 minutes in pre-shift training for new volunteers, covering:

Technology walkthrough. Don’t assume volunteers are tech-savvy. Demonstrate every app function: how to mark doors as “not home,” how to record survey responses, how to skip to the next door, how to access the map view. Have volunteers practice on test data before hitting the field.

Route navigation skills. Show volunteers how to follow GPS directions, what to do if they get lost, and how to identify house numbers quickly. Practice reading the map interface together.

Time management expectations. Explain that effective canvassing means spending 45-90 seconds per door (including walk time), not 3-5 minutes. Demonstrate efficient conversations that gather needed information without getting derailed by lengthy policy discussions.

Common obstacle protocols. Role-play scenarios: What do you do when encountering a locked gate? An aggressive dog? A “No Soliciting” sign? A voter who wants to debate for 20 minutes? Having scripted responses prevents volunteers from freezing or wasting time.

Completion rate expectations. Explicitly state the target completion rate and explain why it matters. “Your goal today is to complete at least 75% of your 65-door turf. This means attempting contact at 49 or more doors. We’ll check in at 5:30 to see how you’re tracking.”

For experienced volunteers returning for additional shifts, provide 10-15 minute refresher training focused on any new procedures or technology updates.

The campaigns with the highest completion rates treat training as an ongoing investment, not a one-time event. They conduct weekly training sessions, create video tutorials volunteers can review between shifts, and pair new volunteers with experienced mentors for their first 2-3 outings. This comprehensive approach to training volunteers for door knocking pays dividends in completion rates throughout the campaign.

Strategy 8: Optimize Canvassing Time Windows

When you send canvassers into the field matters enormously for completion rates. The same turf that takes 3.5 hours to complete during midday might take only 2.5 hours during evening prime time when more voters are home and conversations are shorter.

2026 field operations data reveals clear patterns in optimal canvassing windows:

Weekday evenings (4:00 PM - 7:30 PM) deliver the highest completion rates at 78-85%. Voters are home from work, canvassers have clear end times creating urgency, and there’s enough daylight (or streetlight) to work safely.

Weekend mornings (10:00 AM - 1:00 PM) perform well at 72-80% completion. Voters are home but not yet committed to afternoon activities. Canvassers are fresh and motivated.

Weekend afternoons (2:00 PM - 5:00 PM) show moderate completion at 68-75%. Many voters are out running errands, but those who are home tend to be available for longer conversations.

Weekday midday (11:00 AM - 2:00 PM) produces the lowest completion rates at 55-65%. Fewer voters are home, and those who are (retirees, remote workers, caregivers) often have time for extended conversations that slow progress.

Schedule your highest-priority turfs during peak time windows. Save lower-priority areas for off-peak times when completion rates naturally dip. If you must canvass during midday, reduce turf sizes by 25-30% to maintain achievable completion targets.

Weather also dramatically impacts completion rates. Rain reduces completion by 30-40%, extreme heat by 20-30%, and cold below 35°F by 15-25%. Monitor weather forecasts and adjust turf sizes accordingly. Have backup indoor volunteer activities planned for severe weather days rather than sending canvassers out to fail.

Strategy 9: Address Technology Barriers Proactively

Technology failures are completion rate killers. When canvassing apps crash, phones die, or GPS malfunctions, canvassers waste precious time troubleshooting instead of knocking doors. A 2026 survey of field directors found that technology issues reduce completion rates by an average of 35% when they occur.

Prevent technology barriers with these protocols:

Conduct device checks before every shift. Verify that each canvasser’s phone is charged to at least 80%, has the latest app version installed, and can successfully load their assigned turf. Catch problems in the staging location, not in the field.

Provide portable chargers. Equip each canvassing kit with a fully charged portable battery pack. Phone batteries drain quickly with constant GPS use and screen-on time. Backup power prevents completion rate collapse in the final hour of a shift.

Enable offline mode. Ensure your canvassing app functions without cell service. Many neighborhoods have dead zones where data connections fail. Apps that require constant connectivity create frustration and data loss.

Create technology troubleshooting resources. Develop a one-page guide covering the five most common tech issues and their solutions. Include a tech support phone number canvassers can call for immediate help.

Have backup devices available. Keep 3-4 fully charged backup phones at the staging location. When a canvasser’s device fails completely, they can swap devices and continue their shift rather than going home.

Test in field conditions. Before deploying a new app or device type, test it in actual canvassing conditions — not just in the office. Walk a few turfs yourself to identify usability issues.

The best canvassing technology is invisible technology. When apps work seamlessly, canvassers focus on voter conversations instead of troubleshooting. This is why campaigns increasingly choose purpose-built canvassing platforms like Door Knock that are designed specifically for field conditions rather than adapting general-purpose tools.

Strategy 10: Use Data to Identify and Coach Struggling Canvassers

Not all low completion rates indicate the same problem. One canvasser might be struggling with route navigation while another is spending too much time in conversations. Effective field directors use data to diagnose individual performance issues and provide targeted coaching.

Modern canvassing apps provide detailed performance metrics:

Doors per hour reveals overall productivity. If a canvasser is attempting only 15 doors per hour when the team average is 23, they need intervention.

Time per door shows whether the issue is conversation length or navigation. If someone spends an average of 4 minutes per door when the team average is 2 minutes, they’re likely getting pulled into extended conversations.

Completion rate by time of day indicates whether a canvasser starts strong but fades, or struggles to find momentum. Different patterns require different coaching approaches.

Not home vs. refusal vs. conversation ratios reveal whether a canvasser is marking doors “not home” too quickly (possibly not actually knocking) or getting stuck in unproductive conversations.

When you identify a struggling canvasser (consistently below 70% completion), schedule a one-on-one coaching session. Review their data together and ask diagnostic questions:

Provide specific, actionable coaching based on the diagnosed issue. If someone struggles with navigation, pair them with a mentor for their next shift. If they’re spending too long in conversations, role-play polite exit strategies. If they’re not knocking confidently, practice door approach techniques.

The key is framing coaching as supportive rather than punitive. “I want to help you succeed and feel good about your volunteer time. Let’s figure out what’s getting in your way and fix it together.” This approach retains volunteers while improving performance.

Strategy 11: Eliminate Low-Value Doors from Turfs

Not all doors are created equal. Including low-probability contact doors in your turfs artificially deflates completion rates while providing minimal campaign value. Smart campaigns in 2026 use data to exclude doors that waste canvasser time.

Consider removing these door types from standard canvassing turfs:

Chronic “not homes.” If your voter file shows a household has been marked “not home” on 4+ previous contact attempts across multiple time windows, they’re likely vacant, using the address for mail only, or extremely difficult to contact. Reassign these to specialized “hard to reach” turfs.

Gated communities without access. If you don’t have residents who can provide gate codes or entry, don’t include these doors in standard turfs. They frustrate canvassers and guarantee incomplete turfs.

Businesses and non-residential addresses. Data vendors sometimes include commercial addresses in residential voter files. Scrub these out before creating turfs.

Extremely low-propensity voters. If your campaign targets voters with turnout scores above 30, don’t include 5-propensity voters in your canvassing universe. Focus on doors that matter.

Addresses with documented access issues. If previous canvassers have noted “aggressive dog,” “locked building,” or “no trespassing signs,” consider whether the contact attempt is worth the completion rate hit.

This doesn’t mean abandoning these voters entirely. Create specialized turfs for experienced staff to tackle difficult doors, or assign them to phone banking rather than field contact. The goal is protecting completion rates for your volunteer corps by giving them turfs they can realistically complete.

One important note: be cautious about excluding doors based solely on partisan lean. While it’s tempting to skip households that are strong opponents, these contact attempts still provide valuable data and occasionally identify miscoded supporters. Focus exclusions on logistical barriers, not political assumptions.

Strategy 12: Create Completion-Focused Team Culture

The final strategy is cultural rather than tactical. Campaigns that consistently achieve 80%+ completion rates build organizational cultures where completion is expected, celebrated, and reinforced through every interaction.

This culture manifests in specific ways:

Field directors talk about completion rates constantly. At every staging location meeting, share yesterday’s completion rates by team and individual. Make the metric as visible as doors knocked.

Completion is part of volunteer recognition. When thanking volunteers, mention both quantity (doors knocked) and quality (completion rate). “Sarah knocked 73 doors yesterday with a 95% completion rate — that’s the standard we’re aiming for.”

Leadership models the behavior. Campaign managers and candidates should occasionally canvass and complete their turfs at 100%. This demonstrates that completion expectations apply to everyone.

Completion challenges become team traditions. “Every Saturday in October, we’re going for 85% team average completion. Let’s make it happen.” Repeated weekly goals create momentum and habit.

Low completion is addressed quickly and directly. When someone consistently completes only 50-60% of their turf, have a conversation that same day. Letting it slide signals that completion doesn’t really matter.

Technology and processes are optimized for completion. Every operational decision should be filtered through the question: “Will this help or hurt completion rates?” If a new data collection requirement adds 30 seconds per door, calculate the completion rate impact before implementing.

Celebrate completion milestones. When your team hits a new completion rate record, make a big deal about it. Ring a bell, send a campaign-wide email, post on social media. Positive reinforcement drives behavior.

Building this culture requires consistency from leadership. You can’t emphasize completion rates one week, then ignore them the next. Make completion a permanent fixture of your field operations dashboard, volunteer training, and performance conversations.

The campaigns that win in 2026 are those that execute fundamentals exceptionally well. Door knock completion rates are a fundamental metric that reveals whether your field operation is truly effective or just busy. By implementing these 12 strategies systematically, you’ll transform your completion rates — and your campaign outcomes.

Measuring Success: Tracking Completion Rate Improvements

As you implement these strategies, you need systems to measure whether they’re working. Establish baseline completion rates before making changes, then track improvements weekly.

Your field operations dashboard should display:

Set incremental improvement goals. If you’re currently at 65% completion, don’t expect to jump to 85% overnight. Target 70% for week one, 73% for week two, and so on. Incremental progress is sustainable and builds momentum.

Conduct weekly retrospectives with your field team. What worked well this week? What obstacles did we encounter? Which strategies had the biggest impact? Use this feedback to refine your approach continuously.

Remember that completion rates are a means to an end, not the end itself. The ultimate goal is voter contact and persuasion. A campaign with 80% completion rates and poor conversation quality will lose to a campaign with 75% completion rates and excellent voter interactions. Balance efficiency with effectiveness.

Taking Action: Your Next Steps

Increasing door knock completion rates requires systematic implementation, not sporadic effort. Start by assessing your current state: What’s your baseline completion rate? Which of these 12 strategies are you already using? Where are the biggest gaps?

Prioritize quick wins that require minimal investment. Implementing mid-shift check-ins, setting clear daily targets, and optimizing time windows can boost completion rates by 20-30% within two weeks with zero technology investment.

Then tackle the higher-investment strategies. Evaluate mobile canvassing platforms like Door Knock that provide the technology infrastructure for route optimization, real-time tracking, and performance analytics. The right technology investment pays for itself within weeks through improved completion rates.

Most importantly, make completion rates a permanent part of your field operations culture. Track them, talk about them, and optimize for them every single day. The campaigns that win in 2026 are those that execute better than their opponents — and execution starts with completing the turfs you assign.

Your voters are waiting at their doors. Make sure your canvassers actually knock.

For more strategies on optimizing your field operations, explore our guides on maximizing canvassing hours through route optimization and organizing effective door-to-door campaigns. When you’re ready to transform your completion rates with purpose-built technology, contact our team to see how Door Knock can help your campaign achieve 80%+ completion rates consistently.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good door knock completion rate for political campaigns?

A strong door knock completion rate in 2026 ranges from 75-85% for experienced canvassers and 60-70% for new volunteers. Elite campaigns with optimized routes and mobile technology consistently achieve 80%+ completion rates. Completion rate refers to the percentage of assigned doors actually knocked from your total turf assignment.

How do you calculate door knock completion rate?

Door knock completion rate is calculated by dividing the number of doors actually knocked by the total number of doors assigned, then multiplying by 100. For example, if a canvasser is assigned 80 doors and knocks 68, their completion rate is 85% (68 ÷ 80 × 100). Track both attempted knocks and successful conversations separately for comprehensive metrics.

Why do canvassers fail to complete their assigned turfs?

The most common reasons for low completion rates include poorly optimized routes that waste time, unclear expectations about daily targets, technical issues with canvassing apps, lack of mid-shift accountability check-ins, and assigning turfs that are too large for the available time window. Weather conditions and volunteer fatigue also significantly impact completion rates.

How can mobile canvassing apps improve completion rates?

Mobile canvassing apps increase completion rates by 40-62% through GPS-optimized routing, real-time progress tracking, offline functionality that prevents data loss, and automated skip logic that reduces time spent on each interaction. Apps like Door Knock also provide field directors with live dashboards to identify struggling canvassers and intervene before shift completion.

What time of day has the highest door knock completion rates?

Evening shifts between 4:00 PM and 7:30 PM consistently show the highest completion rates (78-85%) because more voters are home, canvassers have clear time boundaries, and there’s natural urgency to finish before dark. Weekend morning shifts (10:00 AM - 1:00 PM) also perform well at 72-80% completion. Avoid midday shifts which average only 55-65% completion due to fewer home contacts.